Skip to main content
Records Authority
Category: Essential Records and Continuity

Emergency Action Plan

Also known as:
Simply put

An Emergency Action Plan (EAP) is a written document that sets out how people should respond and act during a workplace emergency, such as a fire or other event requiring evacuation. It typically identifies who will take specific actions, provides contact information, and describes procedures intended to support safe and orderly evacuations. In the United States, an EAP is required by certain OSHA standards for particular workplaces.

Formal definition

An Emergency Action Plan (EAP) is a written procedural document that facilitates and organizes employer and employee actions during workplace emergencies, with the primary aim of supporting safe and effective evacuation and response. According to the evidence, an EAP is required under particular U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards (referenced in the source as 29 CFR 1910.38); the specific applicability, mandatory content, and format depend on the governing standard, jurisdiction, and organizational context. Typical contents include designation of responsible personnel, emergency contact information, and instructions and procedures for responding to defined emergency scenarios. Note that requirements outside U.S. OSHA-regulated workplaces vary by jurisdiction and sector, and the EAP is a safety and emergency-preparedness instrument rather than a records management or information governance control, though the plan itself may constitute a record subject to retention obligations.

Why it matters

An Emergency Action Plan addresses a distinct organizational need: coordinating human response during a workplace emergency so that people can evacuate or otherwise act safely. Its value lies in preparation before an incident occurs. By designating responsible personnel, recording emergency contact information, and setting out procedures for defined scenarios, an EAP is intended to reduce confusion and support orderly action at a moment when time and clarity matter. Where an EAP is required, as it is under particular U.S. OSHA standards for certain workplaces, having one is also a compliance obligation rather than an optional practice.

For records and information governance professionals, the EAP is relevant chiefly because the plan is itself a document that may function as a record. Once created, an EAP typically needs to be maintained, kept current, made available to relevant personnel, and retained in accordance with applicable policy and any governing legal or regulatory requirements. In this sense it sits at the intersection of workplace safety and recordkeeping: it is a safety and emergency-preparedness instrument, but the artifact documenting it can carry retention obligations and may serve as evidence that an organization met its preparedness responsibilities.

It is worth emphasizing what falls outside the scope of an EAP. It is not a records management or information governance control, and it does not govern the lifecycle of an organization's records more broadly. Its focus is emergency response and, in many cases, safe evacuation. Requirements for who must have an EAP, what it must contain, and how it must be formatted depend on the governing standard, jurisdiction, and sector, so organizations should not assume that a single national requirement applies universally.

Who it's relevant to

Workplace safety and EHS professionals
Environmental, health, and safety personnel are often responsible for developing, maintaining, and communicating the EAP. They determine what emergency scenarios the plan should address, designate responsible individuals, and ensure the plan supports safe and effective evacuation and response. Where an EAP is legally required, they are typically accountable for meeting the applicable standard.
Records managers and information governance officers
Although the EAP is a safety instrument rather than a records management control, the plan document may itself constitute a record. Records and information governance staff may be involved in ensuring the authoritative version is identifiable, that the plan is retained in accordance with applicable retention policy, and that superseded versions are handled appropriately. Retention obligations depend on jurisdiction, sector, and organizational policy.
Compliance and legal teams
In jurisdictions and sectors where an EAP is mandated, such as U.S. workplaces covered by particular OSHA standards, compliance and legal staff have an interest in confirming that a conforming plan exists, is current, and can be produced as evidence of preparedness. They also help interpret how requirements vary across jurisdictions rather than assuming any single regime applies universally.
Employers and operational managers
Employers and unit or department managers rely on the EAP to organize employee actions during an emergency. In organizations that structure plans by department, local managers may hold responsibility for keeping contact information and evacuation procedures accurate for their area and for ensuring relevant personnel are aware of the plan.

Inside EAP

Scope and Coverage Statement
A defined statement of which facilities, personnel, systems, and record collections the plan addresses, along with the types of emergencies contemplated. Scope typically depends on organizational policy and the nature of the operations, and should make explicit what falls outside the plan.
Roles and Responsibilities
An identification of the individuals or teams accountable for activating and executing the plan, including designated coordinators and their alternates. In a recordkeeping context this often includes those responsible for safeguarding authoritative records as evidence of activity.
Response and Recovery Procedures
Documented steps for reacting to an incident and for recovering affected assets, which for records may distinguish salvage or restoration of authoritative records from the handling of copies, drafts, or transitory information. Procedures often vary by the medium and format of the records concerned.
Prioritization of Vital Records
Criteria for identifying records that are essential to continued operations or to preserving evidence, so that protection efforts can be sequenced. Prioritization typically reflects the importance of maintaining authenticity, reliability, integrity, and usability of records through and after a disruption.
Communication and Notification Arrangements
Provisions for alerting personnel, escalating to responsible parties, and coordinating with external responders where applicable. The specific notification obligations may depend on jurisdiction and sector, particularly where affected records carry privacy or regulatory sensitivity.
Review, Testing, and Maintenance Provisions
Arrangements for periodically reviewing, testing, and updating the plan so that it remains current with organizational, technological, and regulatory change. The frequency and rigor of review generally depend on organizational policy and risk profile.

Common questions

Answers to the questions practitioners most commonly ask about EAP.

Is an Emergency Action Plan the same thing as a records disaster recovery or business continuity plan?
Not exactly, though the concepts overlap and are often confused. In a recordkeeping context, an Emergency Action Plan typically focuses on the immediate protective actions to be taken when an emergency threatens records and the safety of people, while disaster recovery and business continuity planning address the broader restoration of operations and information systems over a longer horizon. Depending on organizational policy, an Emergency Action Plan may be a component of, or a precursor to, wider continuity and recovery arrangements rather than a substitute for them. Organizations should confirm how these documents relate within their own governance framework.
Does having an Emergency Action Plan mean records will be preserved without loss?
No. An Emergency Action Plan is intended to reduce risk and guide response, but it does not guarantee that records will survive an emergency intact. Its effectiveness depends on factors such as how current the plan is, whether staff are trained, the nature and severity of the incident, and the resilience of the storage and backup arrangements already in place. The plan supports the protection of the authenticity, integrity, and usability of records, but outcomes vary and no plan should be presented as offering complete protection.
Who should be responsible for developing and maintaining an Emergency Action Plan?
Responsibility is often shared across roles, and the specific allocation depends on organizational structure and policy. Records managers or information governance officers typically contribute the recordkeeping requirements, while facilities, security, and health and safety functions may address premises and personnel considerations. Assigning a clear owner for keeping the plan current, and defining who has authority to activate it during an incident, is generally regarded as good practice.
Which records or materials should an Emergency Action Plan prioritize?
Prioritization commonly reflects the value, sensitivity, and irreplaceability of records rather than sheer volume. Vital records needed to resume or sustain essential functions, records with long or permanent retention, and unique or authoritative records that cannot be reconstituted from copies are often given priority. The specific priorities depend on an organization's retention schedule, risk assessment, and any statutory obligations, which vary by jurisdiction and sector.
How often should an Emergency Action Plan be reviewed or tested?
Review and testing frequency depends on organizational policy, the pace of change in premises, systems, and personnel, and any regulatory expectations that may apply. Many organizations review such plans periodically and after any significant incident, relocation, or systems change, and some conduct exercises to check that procedures and contact details remain workable. The intent is to keep the plan accurate and actionable rather than to satisfy a fixed universal interval.
How should an Emergency Action Plan account for records held in digital form?
Digital records typically require different protective measures from physical records, so a plan may need to address backup arrangements, system availability, access recovery, and the continued integrity and usability of electronic records. Because digital records depend on hardware, software, and infrastructure that may themselves be affected by an emergency, coordination with IT and information security functions is often necessary. The appropriate measures depend on the systems in use and the organization's broader governance and continuity arrangements.

Common misconceptions

An emergency action plan is the same as a full business continuity or disaster recovery plan.
An emergency action plan often addresses the immediate response to and recovery from an incident, which may form one component of a broader continuity or recovery framework rather than the whole of it. The precise relationship depends on organizational policy, and the terms are not necessarily interchangeable.
Recovering any accessible copy of the information is sufficient after an emergency.
Recovering information is not the same as preserving records. A record's evidential value depends on properties such as authenticity, reliability, integrity, and usability, so a plan should distinguish authoritative records from copies, drafts, or transitory information and address whether those properties can be maintained through recovery.
Once written and approved, an emergency action plan can be filed and left unchanged.
A plan that is not periodically reviewed, tested, and maintained may become outdated as facilities, systems, personnel, and obligations change. Ongoing maintenance is typically necessary for the plan to remain effective, with review frequency depending on organizational policy and risk.

Best practices

Explicitly define the plan's scope, stating which facilities, systems, and record collections it covers and what falls outside it, so responsibilities are not assumed by default.
Identify and prioritize vital records in advance, so that protection and recovery efforts can focus first on records essential to operations or to preserving evidence.
Distinguish authoritative records from copies, drafts, and transitory information within recovery procedures, and address how authenticity, reliability, integrity, and usability will be maintained.
Assign clear roles and responsibilities, including designated alternates, to those accountable for activating the plan and safeguarding records.
Confirm that notification and handling arrangements account for any jurisdiction- and sector-specific obligations, such as privacy or regulatory requirements, that may apply to affected records.
Schedule periodic review, testing, and updating of the plan, with frequency proportionate to the organization's risk profile and consistent with organizational policy.